Policy Efforts and Recommendations to Counter Chinese Scientific and Technology Acquisition from the United States and South Korea
Check out two reports published from DKI APCSS Alumni, Jackson Scott. The first paper examines the consequences of IP theft, while the second outlines policy recommendations to counter it.
The Impact and Consequences of Chinese Scientific and Technological Acquisition from the United States and South Korea
From the report's description, "This policy report examines the impact and consequences of the acquisition of science and technology research from the United States and South Korea to China by extra-legal and illegal means. China has strategically prioritized the acquisition of foreign technology through both legal and illegal means as part of its comprehensive strategy of increasing its competitive advantage in power. The Chinese government implements a “whole-of-society” approach to technology acquisition, leveraging multiple entities including the Ministry of State Security, state-owned enterprises, private companies, universities, and military organizations."
Click here to read more and access the full report.
Policy Efforts and Recommendations to Counter Chinese Scientific and Technology Acquisition from the United States and South Korea
From the report's description, "This policy report examines current efforts by the United States and South Korea to counter Chinese scientific and technological acquisition through illegal and extralegal means, particularly intellectual property (IP) theft and espionage. China uses cutting-edge technology from both countries to undercut US and Korean industry and enhance its own military capabilities – thus endangering both countries’ economic interests and national security. The open nature of science and technology (S&T) research and development in both the US and South Korea has sparked major innovations in both countries. However, this openness also presents a unique challenge in developing policies that combat China’s illegal and extralegal activities without sacrificing the transparency of US and South Korean research and development."
