Skip to main content

Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes Home

Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes

  • Request new password
  • Login with PKI
Log in with CAC
Forgot Password?
  • Home
  • News
  • Activities
    • Defense Education Enhancement Program (DEEP)
    • Combating Terrorism (CT-WG)
    • Defense Education Development Working Group (EDWG)
    • Regional Stability in South East Europe (RSSEE-SG)
    • Regional Security in the South Caucasus Study Group (RSSC-SG)
    • Emerging Security Challenges Working Group (ESCWG)
    • Journal Connections
  • Products
  • About
  • GlobalNET LMS
  • Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Aca...
  • PfPC Products
  • How Smart is Smart Defense? A Review of NATO’s ...

How Smart is Smart Defense? A Review of NATO’s Smart Defense Proposal

Print Share Download PDF
0 comments
By Mikaela Blackwood
Introduction
 
Since 2008, the world has experienced a severe economic crisis, one that has led to many austerity measures, including deep cuts in defense spending in many countries. As NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has argued, maintaining a capable and effective NATO Alliance in this era of financial crisis presents a real and pressing challenge for NATO.In response to these challenges, at the Munich Security Conference in February 2011 Rasmussen launched a proposal for “Smart Defense.” This proposal aims to examine how “NATO can help nations to build greater security with fewer resources.” It emphasizes the need to “spend better” by prioritizing, specializing, and seeking multinational solutions. This article will examine and analyze the proposal for Smart Defense with a view to assessing its value in helping NATO surmount the fiscal challenges it faces. The first section will provide a brief overview of the current fiscal environment within NATO member states, including key member states’ current and planned defense spending cuts and how these cuts will impact burden sharing within NATO. The next section will briefly describe the Secretary-General’s Smart Defense proposal, and will explore each pillar of the concept. The third section will examine the key challenges and strengths of
the proposal. Finally, conclusions will be drawn about the ability of the Smart Defense proposal to help NATO overcome the current fiscal challenges.
From PfPC | anonymous | 20 Jun 2013

Associated Files

View (0.134 MB)
Reconstruction and Stability Operations, Security Studies
See all tags »

Related Content

Education and Training
Managing Strategic Changes Through DEEP Reforms: A View from the Perspective of U.S.–Armenia “Smart Power” Cooperation
Building Partnership Capacity
Ballistic Missile Defense in Poland: Did the Costs Outweigh the Benefits?
See all related stories »
 

About PfPC

The Partnership for Peace Consortium (PfPC) of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes is a voluntary association of institutes of higher learning in defense and security affairs. Linking over 800 defense academies through a network of educators and researchers by sharing best practices and developing concrete solutions to common challenges.


About PfPC

Find us on Social Media

Footer: About GlobalNET

GlobalNET represents a network of organizations and their representative members who are working to foster national and international collaboration as well as to maintain relationships, and strengthen partner capacity.

Footer: GlobalNET Main Links

  • About GlobalNET
  • Contact GlobalNET
  • GlobalNET Partners

Footer: GlobalNET Partner

These are the GlobalNET partners

GlobalNET Support

  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Help Desk
  • How to use GlobalNET
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility